View Single Post
Old 09-14-2015, 09:19 PM   #1 (permalink)
JRMichler
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,018

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 43.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
Test of P&G vs DWL

I finally did a test of P&G vs DWL on the highway. Conditions were ideal for a P&G test - no traffic behind me, level road, 65 degrees, and a light tailwind. MPG is from my Scangauge, which reads about 5% or 6% low. I do not bother to better calibrate it because the relative readings are good.

A stretch of DWL resulted in 36 MPG on the Scangauge. The road is level, with slight rises and falls of 2 to 4 feet. I tested P&G between 50 to 55 MPH, timed to take advantage of the road undulations, slight as they were. Results: P&G gave me 40 MPG.

I do not normally P&G on a level road because glide distances are shorter than the accelerations. A typical 50 to 55 pulse and glide is less than a mile. And because gliding below 55 MPH in a 55 limit on a two lane road with limited passing is too rude.

The MPG difference between DWL and P&G increases at slower speeds, and with larger speed differentials.

__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JRMichler For This Useful Post:
Daox (09-15-2015), Joggernot (09-15-2015), MetroMPG (09-14-2015)