Test of P&G vs DWL
I finally did a test of P&G vs DWL on the highway. Conditions were ideal for a P&G test - no traffic behind me, level road, 65 degrees, and a light tailwind. MPG is from my Scangauge, which reads about 5% or 6% low. I do not bother to better calibrate it because the relative readings are good.
A stretch of DWL resulted in 36 MPG on the Scangauge. The road is level, with slight rises and falls of 2 to 4 feet. I tested P&G between 50 to 55 MPH, timed to take advantage of the road undulations, slight as they were. Results: P&G gave me 40 MPG.
I do not normally P&G on a level road because glide distances are shorter than the accelerations. A typical 50 to 55 pulse and glide is less than a mile. And because gliding below 55 MPH in a 55 limit on a two lane road with limited passing is too rude.
The MPG difference between DWL and P&G increases at slower speeds, and with larger speed differentials.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|