View Single Post
Old 10-19-2015, 06:49 AM   #6 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,467

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,213
Thanked 4,391 Times in 3,365 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgfpro View Post
At light load you don't need a high octane fuel due to low amount of fuel and heat being produced. At mid load you now have to increase your octane because there is now enough fuel to make enough heat that the engine becomes heat soaked.
This gives me an idea. Octane booster could be held separately from low-octane fuel, and mixed as conditions dictate. The majority of the time that an engine operates, it doesn't require the full octane rating.

Colder air or higher elevations at light load would reduce the octane mixture. Heavier loads at lower elevations would increase the octane mixture.

Perhaps there would be cost and performance improvements by having continuously adjustable octane?
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote