Auto in N question
The family and I went to see my Brother in NC this past weekend
We took the PT Crusier - auto tranny.
I did hook up the SG so i could see how we did.
I gathered data on the car at several speeds to get a feel for the impact MPH on MPG
While doing this - i also wanted to see if coasting in gear was better or worse then costing in Neutral.
From a consumptiuon point of view - coasting in N seemed to use slightly LESS fuel than coasting in gear. I suspect the PT does not have a fuel shut off as the MPG did not skyrocket.
Both cases had the instant MPG jump to about 75 ( N hit 80 a few times) hence i called it SLIGHTLY less fuel.
I wanna play with it some more and get more data - a little more contolled than "30 minutes of data crusing across SC)
Here is my observation and question.
When i shift the tranny into N - I expected the RPM to drop to Idle - which is what the Manual in my Altima does... but it did not?
going 65 mph was about 2400 rpm or so. shift to N - engine stayed near 2400 RPM ! HUH? Both the TACH and the SG said this..
the MPG did go up so i know less fuel is going IN -
Is this normal for an AUTO? Am i thinking "Manual Tranny" here?
I do not drive the Crusier much ( wifes car) so i had not played with it before. but am a little confused at this.
Steve
__________________
Steve - AKA Doofus McFancypants
------------------------------
"If there's a new way, I'll be the first in line - But it better work this time"
First Milestone passed - 30 MPG (city) 5/15/08
Best City Tank - 8/31/09- 34.3 MPG (EPA= 20)
Best Highway Tank - 5/20/09 - 36.5 MPG (EPA= 28)
------
In effort to drive less:
Miles NOT driven in 2009 = 648 (Work from home and Alt Transporatation)
|