View Single Post
Old 04-21-2016, 04:32 PM   #18 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,363
Thanks: 24,463
Thanked 7,401 Times in 4,795 Posts
laminar

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Is that for true laminar flow, which we aren't going to get on the street anyway?
Frank,the solar racers which use them are only laminar on their bodies up to their maximum cross-section,where the 1st minimum pressure occurs,and boundary layer jumps to a turbulent boundary layer.The wheel fairings up front would behave the same way.The rear fairings would be potentially running in the turbulence of the front wheel fairings.
So we shouldn't consider them laminar unless they were running solo,on a closed-course,on a windless day,at very low velocity.
I think some of the cars have been tested upwards of 90-mph (Honda Dream-2)
The Cd 0.12 1957 MG EX 181 would not be a laminar car,running 250-mph.

Come September 9th I hope to have some definitive data,as the T-100 will sport completely illegal- depth wheel fairings in the wind tunnel, which simulate 'active' fairings deployed only above 45-mph highway driving.
PS: Also,Hucho tells us in his books that the only way for a passenger car to approach Cd 0.08,is to further integrate the wheels into the body.Which implies the use of fairings.
Ford got to Cd 0.137 with their 1985 Prove-V by bringing the wheels into the body and fairing them a bit.They could go lower with active devices.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/

Last edited by aerohead; 04-21-2016 at 04:44 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (04-21-2016), deejaaa (04-21-2016), MobilOne (04-22-2016)