Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyLugNut
Most are found in printed textbooks or behind .edu firewalls.
|
Nice cop out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyLugNut
I do appreciate your persistence in working through this but I have to find links that will be understandable and there are few of those as this is a subject that is not of interest to most and is not reduced to a few Wiki's.
|
Try me, if I can figure out what the microscopic cross section of absorption means I think I can figure out anything you throw at me. Show me where this information is. It can't be a secret. If you really appreciate me you'll show me where it says what you say somewhere that isn't a wretched hive of HHO proponents all nodding in agreement over something they really haven't a clue about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyLugNut
And I am not saying the H+ is created in the electrolysis cell and carried for a time to the combustion chamber. It is a gas, H2. But, if you look up the relative energies of dissociation, you will see that H2 has a relatively low energy compared to other diatomic molecules. It easily dissociates to form H+ if enough energy is available.
|
And I'm saying this is BS. It Burns...It Oxidizes and that's that. There is no "High Energy" specifically breaking apart the minuscule amount of H2 you are adding and turning it into some sort of crazed ion atom that shreds vast numbers of hydrocarbon molecules in nanoseconds. That's just patent BS you use on people who are not able to understand better. What about all the hydrogen that is brought to the equation in the gasoline???? Why doesn't it "Dissociate and form H+" too there is like 9,000 times more hydrogen in the gasoline than the added hydrogen you are putting into the system.
Show me an outside source that states this.....quit telling me it's "Just something I read somewhere, so it's true, trust me."
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyLugNut
But, what if it is available before hand? That is what a we can do by adding H2 into the combustion chamber and providing the variables to provide the energy to dissociate it.
|
Again, you are adding 1 part in 9,000. It does NOTHING but burn to succinctly answer your question. And WTF variables are you "providing"? Seriously. Do you even hear yourself. You are like the poster child for pseudoscience BS lingo. Why dazzle with brilliance when you can baffle with BS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyLugNut
Also look up thermal depolymerization, as that is what is going on with the fuel chain at combustion.
|
Don't do this again. Why do you ask me to look things up to prove a point you're trying to make? I'm not a 12 year old in a class that needs to learn this. I'm a skeptic of your information and I'm asking you to prove yourself. You look it up and provide a link and explain how it supports your argument that H+ is being created from only the 1 part of 9,000 hydrogen that you are adding.
Are you capable of answering questions? Or do you just keep trying to talk your way out of this by adding more and more layers of gobbily gook lingo hoping we give up and stop trying to let facts stand in the way of a good fallacy.
I am asking you to specifically back up "Facts" you have stated, I am not asking you to look up or prove anything other than that. You say these things, prove them.