[gumby79]

Originally Posted by ChazInMT

3-20%....People get those variations over normal driving.

We have beaten HHO to death and have come to the conclusion
So, unless you can explain how you can produce a lot of hydrogen and explain how the tiny addition of hydrogen to the gasoline creates an appreciable gain in power, beyond the power used to create it, you may wanna end this talk about how HHO can improve MPG.

The Hocus Pocus mumbo jumboxis the cutting edge of plasma science. There still submitting new words to Webster to described the different aspects of plasma..
The difference between HHO and H2 is simple
H2 is a highly reactive element in gas form (as it applies in this conversation)
HHO is H2O in plasma state . H2O is a moleculein the 4th phase. ... plasma.
Notic the different shape .
Extra electrons
Polarities

The extra attached electrons release more energy escaping orbit than it takes to enter orbit. Eg it takes more energy to escape Earths gravitational force than it takes to enter. Shoemaker-levy 9 took 0.0 enregy to enter Jupiter's atmosphere but released astronomical amounts of energy. Had levy 9 come in the right angle speed ect ect, it would have been a new moon on the first pass or 10+ on the 2nd pass..

In order for ignition to occur the extra electrons most both reach escape volisity.

Your stand seems to be:
It's a brake even technology. You don't lose efficiency, but you don't gain so its a waste.

My stand is:
I agree.
If the charging efficiency improved 5% (from 7%to 12%),however, this would become a viable technology .
Gumby Stay Flexible.