Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com - View Single Post

California98Civic · 05-01-2017, 12:24 AM

I confess, I have always found BSFC maps labelled like this one a little confusing. The vertical axis is labelled "engine torque" but we are discussing it as if it is "load percentage." The below image from Autospeed article ECONORAM linked in post #28 above has a map labelled "engine load" on the vertical axis. Torque and load % are not the same thing, though. And on Autospeed graph it seems like 45% to 65% load would yield the best FE.

05-01-2017, 12:24 AM	#29 (permalink)
California98Civic Cyborg ECU Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Coastal Southern California Posts: 6,299 Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe Team Honda 90 day: 66.42 mpg (US) Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike 90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US) Thanks: 2,373 Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts	I confess, I have always found BSFC maps labelled like this one a little confusing. The vertical axis is labelled "engine torque" but we are discussing it as if it is "load percentage." The below image from Autospeed article ECONORAM linked in post #28 above has a map labelled "engine load" on the vertical axis. Torque and load % are not the same thing, though. And on Autospeed graph it seems like 45% to 65% load would yield the best FE. __________________ See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.