View Single Post
Old 05-08-2017, 01:06 AM   #28 (permalink)
BabyDiesel
Lean Burn Cruiser!
 
BabyDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 936

Big Blazin' - '88 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Silverado
SUV
90 day: 14.97 mpg (US)

Chili - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
House of Tudor
Team Streamliner
90 day: 72.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 840
Thanked 491 Times in 310 Posts
Fordman - Thank you! I checked and told the wrong manufacturer. They are Denso Iridium, Part # SK20HR11. Funny thing, I went to Oreillys for the SPs after Honda didn't have them had to go to the corporate office in Springfield! No one keeps anything in stock around Southern Mizzou for the 1st Gen Insight.

Pete c - Thank you for the encouragement! I miss the Escort, I had A LOT of fun with that build. I'm going at the Insight with the same intensity, just slower as I don't have access to materials as readily in Mizzou than NC.

One of my main focuses on this build is going to be the same as the Escort - aerodynamics. The Insight is amazing in factory form, but as all vehicles, is a template for the artist to showcase his/her skills and talents.

I achieved an 18.5% reduction in drag on the Escort (0.33 to 0.269). The same on the Insight would give me a Cd of 0.204, which I think is achievable. My hypothesis is that Honda didn't do to well with the Insight. Phil Knox (Aerohead) has said repeatedly that 0.25 is the start of "Low Drag Territory". It makes sense for a manufacturer, even Honda, to achieve this mark and say "Good enough!" because it would look good for those who know what 0.25 Cd signifies.
__________________



Remember, thank a fellow EM'er for a helpful post!!!
I hypermile better in my cowboy boots

Past threads:
ZX2 modding thread
Ecomodder's Top 10: How they do it!
ZX2 Aerodynamics: Shooting for 0.15 Cd
ZX2 coast-down testing for Cd & Crr
  Reply With Quote