View Single Post
Old 02-02-2018, 03:25 PM   #14 (permalink)
Daschicken
EcoModding flying lizard
 
Daschicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 743

Cibbie - '88 Honda CBR 250R
Motorcycle
90 day: 48.49 mpg (US)

Rarity - '06 Honda Accord EX V6
Team Honda
90 day: 29.88 mpg (US)

Baby viff - '86 Honda VFR 400R
Motorcycle
90 day: 42.15 mpg (US)

Latios - '08 Suzuki SV650SF
Motorcycle
90 day: 64.56 mpg (US)

Mazda 3 - '14 Mazda 3 i Sport
90 day: 43.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 618
Thanked 263 Times in 175 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
Variable intake is primarily useful on NA engines, whereas the trend is to go turbo. But yea they can be very effective. The 911 GT3 and Lexus LFA engines are NA, non-switchable cam profile 9000+rpm, but they have pretty good low end torque thanks to 3 switchable intake runner lengths.
I sure wish my CBR 250R had a variable intake... 17,000 RPM+, BIG headers, very oversquare, carburetors... It is not a recipe for good low or midrange torque. I still operate it at 3,000 RPM or below frequently though. It doesn't help that 45 mph in 6th gear puts it at 5,600 RPM(AFTER dropping 3 teeth on the rear sprocket), but I try.
__________________
-Kaze o tatakaimasen-

Best trip in V6: 52.0
Best tank in V6: 46.0
Best tank in Mazda: 49.9
Best tank in CBR: 61.3
Best tank in SV: 83.9

Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
You can lead a fashion-conscious horse to unusual-looking water...

  Reply With Quote