Quote:
Originally Posted by All Darc
Uhn, what you did wrong ?
I refered about bad people, violent. Not all people who got jail are really bad.
Since you said to be in faver of humiliation of thiefs, I presume you did something else.
|
In high school, I aided and abetted (helped) friends who blew up some portable toilets by allowing them to store the materials on my parent's property. In US law, simply having knowledge of a crime and not reporting it is considered aiding, and carries the full penalty as committing the crime. Humiliation is an appropriate way to punish most crimes, including my own.
Quote:
Incentives are also a alternative.
I presume the government cost with crap and criminal born from criminal families, it's right. So what if the government pay let's say 2000 bucks for someone with trouble past, violent acts, get vasectomy or ligature ? Or even for such inplants. It would still save money from government, avoiding the born of generations of violent criminals.
I keep saying, the worst enemy of each country it's their own culture. That's why countries with rich natuiral resources, rich nature, space, like Brazil, it's screw-up.
|
Financial incentive makes sense to me. The far left would argue that the poor are "forced by circumstance" to agree to such a procedure, so it would probably never pass.
The worst enemy is always within. First within ourselves, then within our families, and so on and so forth.
Unfortunately the average person has only average sophistication of thought. That means complex problems are usually oversimplified, and the solutions to those oversimplified problems are oversimplified themselves. We identify a complex issue as a problem with "crime" and propose the solution to be mandatory sentencing. Just get tough on crime, that's all you have to do.
