View Single Post
Old 05-04-2018, 04:57 PM   #148 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
It will be just fine with at least the rear bar delete. If there is to be a remaining bar I'd think you'd want it on the heavy end- the front. My Metro never had a rear bar.

None of my Tempos ever had a rear bar; sway tuning was done with the front bar. I experimented with three different strength bars on two different Tempos and found:
on the 'Coupe, which is lowered which means the springs are slightly stiffer, a heavier bar than stock only added ride harshness without any discernable cornering advantage on the street; on an a/t Tempo, which gets a heavier bar stock because the a/t puts more weight up front, I put a lighter m/t bar in and enjoy a noticeably smoother Cadillac ride.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (05-04-2018)