Thread: Solar HHO
View Single Post
Old 07-06-2018, 07:43 PM   #8 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,811

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,479 Times in 3,444 Posts
Solar panels are somewhere around 20% efficient under optimal conditions (directly facing sun, at noon, on a cloudless day, not behind glass). The process of decomposing water into hydrogen is something like 33% efficient. That alone makes your 100W panel output only 33W equivalent power in hydrogen. Let's say the combustion process is 25% efficient at extracting heat energy (combustion) and making kinetic energy. That means 8.25W of power provided by the 100W solar panel, or about 1% of 1 horsepower.

You may as well attach a hamster wheel to the crank, or add half a PSI to all 4 tires.

Efficiency means making as few conversions of energy as possible. If you're capturing sunlight and turning it into electrical power, keep it as electrical power to maximize efficiency rather than subjecting it to these conversion losses:

sunlight > electricity > hydrogen (chemical energy) > heat > kinetic

Exploiting energy in a Rube Goldberg way is not efficient, just as his contraptions for flipping a switch are not efficient.

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!

Last edited by redpoint5; 07-06-2018 at 08:08 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
Ecky (07-07-2018)