View Single Post
Old 08-23-2018, 06:49 PM   #47 (permalink)
Stacygifford
Eco Storm Chaser
 
Stacygifford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Lubbock
Posts: 174

Nemo - '87 Ford Mustang GT
90 day: 27.26 mpg (US)

K-sight - '02 Honda Insight
90 day: 39.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 73 Times in 38 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky View Post
Link to the cam phaser you got?
Its just a stock TSX cam phaser (same as the K24A4 accord and the K24A1 CRV, and the base RSX)
I will be throwing it up in the mill and milling it myself.
Technically i could just run the 50deg phaser from the newer Si, or the RSX-S (K20A2, K20Z3, ect)

On the 04-05 K24A2 clearances are very tight and one mi**** could cause disaster @50. the 06+ have a larger cutout in the piston and "should" be safe with the stock cam.

I may change to a larger cam in the future so I will play it safe at either 40 or 45 degrees

will remove the sharpied part for reference



Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
I am confused by the graphs, especially the AFR one. What is the baseline fuel consumption they are measuring +/- change in consumption against? And why does stoich show 2% higher fuel consumption? Shouldn't stoich be the zero? Seems like there is a problem, no?
The baseline is with the stock tune if I'm not mistaken. I am also assuming the test were done one at a time. I dont think they combined all 3 to see what could be achieved, otherwise I'm sure they would have posted it.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Stacygifford For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (08-24-2018)