Quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xist
You disagree with him, therefore he is wrong?
|
It has got nothing to do with me. Crowder is a blogger, who has been shown to get the science wrong, on many things - and therefore he is not a credible source.
|
I got 1:27* into the first one and 0:21 into the second. potholer54 has the affect of a sanctimonious pr*ck. "...there's no need for real-time debate in science" Because it can't be peer reviewed ...or what?
Quote:
|
Louder With Crowder is not a credible source. He has been debunked.
|
Perhaps you misapprehend long-form journalism. Crowder, like Joe Rogan, is a
comedian. He has guests. The guests may or may not be falsifiable sources. Admittedly, I know nothing about his blog, just the Youtube stuff.
*I can't pull it out of the transcript, but the in graphic quotes about 'fluctuations' they're talking past each other.
edit:
Both potholer54 and Thunderfoot rub me the wrong way. I prefer a less affect[at]ed host, like Joe Scott or Scott Manley.