View Single Post
Old 09-15-2018, 03:19 PM   #2919 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,225
Thanks: 24,372
Thanked 7,357 Times in 4,757 Posts
therefore

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
You disagree with him, therefore he is wrong?
If Crowder knew anything about Global Climate Change research,he'd already know that natural variability of solar irradiance does not force climate change in magnitudes sufficient to compensate for anthropogenic carbon emissions.
This sort of thing was sorted out in 1995.
Eigil Friis-Christensen & Knud Lassen were wrong.
Sallie Baliunas and Robert Jastrow were wrong.
The Sun's irradiance/senescence cycle only varies 0.1%
The Maunder Minimum (when there weren't any sunspots at all),combined with the actual reason for irradiance,of the Little Ice Age displayed only a 0.14% delta.
The Milankovitch cycles aren't events measured in human lifetimes.
There won't be any global cooling.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
 
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (09-18-2018), niky (09-17-2018)