View Single Post
Old 12-04-2018, 01:22 AM   #77 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,465

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
I see it more on a cost basis than tied to the size of vehicles.
I see that point too, but then there does tend to be a relationship between size and cost as well.

There are diminishing returns on hybrid technology and weight though. The Edison 2 was gas only because it was so lightweight that creating a hybrid drivetrain couldn't justify the cost and added weight. Others on this site report getting just about the same fuel economy in a Gen I Insight with the EV portion of the system disabled.

The heavier something is, the more advantageous to supplement acceleration with an electric motor. The heavier the vehicle, the more advantageous it is to recapture that kinetic energy when slowing down.

All that said, the battery is the achilles heel of hybrids and EVs, so that likely explains why smaller vehicles and smaller batteries were engineered first.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote