Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
Peer review like this:
https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/14/s...lobal-warming/
Scientists behind a headline-grabbing climate study admitted they “really muffed” their paper.
Their study claimed to find 60 percent more warming in the oceans, but that was based on math errors.
The errors were initially spotted by scientist Nic Lewis, who called them “serious (but surely inadvertent) errors.”
I guess their peer review is if it sounds good we will go along with it. |
NO!
You are rehashing the Keeling study - again. And you link that story from yet another Koch brother funded hate site.
Go to the source, you will see the facts.
Yes, there was an error - in the margin of error, the conclusion remained the same.
But you already know that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
Thet is the text book example of a waste of time.
|
I feel a thread lock approaching.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
  lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.
For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
|