View Single Post
Old 02-28-2019, 05:37 PM   #128 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,599

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,453 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil View Post
I agree that (Model S) pack failed. It wasn't a chemistry related problem though.
I was actually referring to the Model X pack, as it stood out against the other Model X-es in their fleet.
I liked that link as it was no typical Tesla fan brouhaha. It pointed out what went wrong and what went right. It is a pity to take a onesided view from such balanced reporting.

The point I'm making is that these failures have nothing to do with longevity or reliability.
A faulty assembly was faulty from day 1. It only became apparent later. But it is not a situation that would occur in anything but a small minority of packs.

The fact that there's no way to test for age on new batteries does not mean there's nothing that can be said about it. Average Tesla pack degradation seems to reduce rather than accelerate over time. So it is fair to expect degradation will not dramatically increase any time soon.

I maintain that todays battery technology has reached a level of reliability that ensures most EV buyers will never have to swap the battery.
My understanding from reading the article is the "eHawk" is the Model S that has had two packs fail. The 7 Model Xs are on their first packs so far.

Two battery pack failures out of 10 is a really poor failure rate.

Last edited by JSH; 02-28-2019 at 05:41 PM.. Reason: typo
  Reply With Quote