View Single Post
Old 04-02-2019, 07:48 PM   #365 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,741

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 85.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,469 Times in 3,434 Posts
That is exactly what I've been saying; that taxation is the proper way to manipulate a market and affect necessary changes, and the closer to the root problem you target the taxation, the more effective it will be.

As you point out, it isn't the miles that cause the pollution. It isn't even necessarily the highly inefficient vehicles that cause the pollution if they aren't being driven.

So why do people still try to dance around the problem without looking at it directly? Why do the politicians with the most idiotic ideas even get 1 second of notice? It's like people are mesmerized by Rube Goldberg solutions to a problem, but not the simple and reliable methods.

As I said in another forum:

Quote:
EV subsidies are stupid, corrupt, and pointless. It's like trying to get a guy to stop beating you with a baseball bat by promoting the sale of wiffle ball.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
RedDevil (04-03-2019)