View Single Post
Old 04-10-2019, 11:40 AM   #12 (permalink)
Ecky
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 54.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
That double claim of larger diameter (for lower RR) and narrower width (for drag reduction) has come up before in our debates, but maybe without resolution. So it is great to see confirmation from a manufacturer. The i3 tires drew all of our attention. But the claim here, by Bridgestone of increased wet weather traction is new. Anyone believe that?
I've been reading a lot about tires lately, and here's what I've picked up:

Many people put wider tires on performance cars to get a larger contact patch and more traction. This is WRONG. More contact patch does improve traction (despite what the standard friction equation from physics would have you think). However, contact patch is mostly a function of weight and air pressure, so a wider tire (all else being equal) has a contact patch with the same area that's wider but less long. This will give increased traction from lateral movement (e.g. cornering) but actually reduce traction when accelerating and braking, especially in wet conditions.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
Galvatron1 (01-09-2020)