|
That website might have 20% factual articles, but then why link to them if there were any alternative whatsoever. I suppose if there are no other sources to relay the same info, I might consider linking to them, but then I'd have to weigh the benefit of providing the rare useful link with the drawback of promoting a cesspool.
I have a negative bias because the site will literally remove a comment that points out things like "the law of the conservation of energy doesn't work that way". The culture and editors have no interest in understanding how the universe works, they simply want to spread a religious view.
|