View Single Post
Old 05-04-2019, 01:56 PM   #5750 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,272
Thanks: 24,394
Thanked 7,363 Times in 4,763 Posts
fossil-fuels vs human health

Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
Is it Okay if Scott Adams agrees with you?

I was going to put this in Xist's thread about building a shed, but consider it here. The Pacific Northwest has deposits 30 ft deep of the ash that the [Ancient] Romans used to make concrete with Pozzolan, unreinforced and underwater. In a Youtube video
(Supervolcanoes in the Pacific Northwest
54,427 views — Central Washington University — Published on Apr 25, 2019)
At 42:00 we find out that the big dams that Woodie Guthrie (Arlo's dad) sang about were made with it. That explains their white color.

Truckloads of that stuff would facilitate producing ecological pod houses.

edit: How about a little of this? [Dennis Hopper in Easy Rider]

Episode 516 Scott Adams: The World’s Dumbest Tweet AOC, It’s a Doozy

A 15 minute rant on — it's not just dumb it's dangerous to say fossil fuels haven't improved human health.
Perhaps you missed some of the conversation pertaining to fossil-fuel-induce extinction.That would be a health implication in the negative.
'improved human health' is a perfectly contextual comment,and is valid,only within the extremely myopic worldview in which it is framed.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
 
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (05-05-2019), NeilBlanchard (05-06-2019)