View Single Post
Old 05-15-2019, 01:15 PM   #5836 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
collapse

Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler View Post
Limits to growth in 1972 was pretty accurate also.
.
.

.
.
"This suggests, from a rational riskbased perspective, that we have squandered the past decades, and that preparing for a collapsing
global system could be even more important than trying to avoid collapse."
.
https://sustainable.unimelb.edu.au/_...urner_2014.pdf
.
Simplify now and beat the rush.
If the economists will exhibit full transparency,and a full accounting of actual costs,the free-market will probably sort the whole thing out on its own, over some organic timescale,incrementally.The one-percenters used to request 12-years in which to move their investment portfolio around to a new paradigm.That's well within the time frame climate scientists say we have as a safety margin.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/