Quote:
|
AGW science never developed as a political affiliation. Exxon & anti-AGW funded talkers have all talk & "sigh-ants", but no AGW science. redpoint twists in the wind to adorn AGW, as a political talking point, as Exxon, industrial polluters & energy companies have also struggled to dress AGW.
|
Only one intentional mis-spelling, but what about 'twists in the wind to adorn' and 'struggled to dress'? Dress as in cloak or address?
Quote:
|
AGW science never developed as a political affiliation.
|
Now that is flat wrong. The science has be appropriated by decidedly political interests. In the USofA that's the Social Democrats.