Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
I've read some of the debate papers on this issue.I believe that the decision was,that Mann's data is his own private property,and he,nor anyone else are obliged to share it with anyone,and especially special-interest,hired prostitute,pretend-scientists who'd only attempt to use it for skeptic/contrarian/denier propaganda,like Balliunas,Soon,Michaels,Singer,Balling,Idso,Graybi ll,Knappenberger,Davis,Frauenfeld,McKitrick,McInty re,Happer Kueter,Robinson,etc. have done.
They're not worthy of the data.Aiding and abetting the enemy is a capital crime.
|
And here lies the problem.
Quote:
|
Mann's data is his own private property,and he,nor anyone else are obliged to share it with anyone
|
How dare mere mortal men question Michael Manns work.
His work and hockey stick graph was the “GENESIS” moment of the global warming movement.
And just like any religion or cult, mere mortals are not allowed to question their doctrine and or founders.
They preach “Doom and Gloom” if one does not get behind their cause.
They require their followers to be unwavering fanatical participants.
They require that their followers not be lead astray by differing opinions.
They require that their followers attack and strike down all naysayers.
Case in point.
Quote:
|
They're not worthy of the data.Aiding and abetting the enemy is a capital crime.
|
Questioning and requiring proof of a scientific theory is “aiding and abetting the enemy “ ???
Really...???
Maybe a refresher coarse on how the scientific process works is required...
https://images.app.goo.gl/FFA7cnhAk6cqU4zf7
Note the process is circular, not linear.
In the cartoon to the right of the process...
Step Two is where the AGW crowd
inserted Michael Mann and the hockey stick graph...
>