View Single Post
Old 09-04-2019, 11:54 AM   #6749 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
aerohead's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 14,927
Thanks: 23,060
Thanked 6,815 Times in 4,337 Posts

Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
I have no problem with real science. Only the fake science.

I would be more open to that. That is more likely closer to reality.
The the church of climatology believes everything they have is real science, irrefutable, not open for debate, settled science, ect. If it's not open for debate, then it's not science.
The most shocking thing to me is when they try to act like their hypothesis is a law of science.
With an Associates Arts degree,how is it that you can make a distinction between the two? Did you sneek in a dozen multi-disciplinary climate Ph.D.s and 40-years of field research,if not a minimum of 10,000 hours,in each of these dozens of disciplines?
Throw us a bone.
If so,then you have the floor.
Photobucket album:
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (09-04-2019)