Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird
I'm hesitant to get off track, but to me the simplest way to be carbon neutral or even carbon negative is to build mass scale atmospheric carbon scrubbers and put them as close as possible to the biggest sources of CO2 production man or natural. This may very well cost billions if not even a trillion, but that's less expensive than something like the green new deal by a factor of 10. That is based in current costs of the technology which just like batteries or anything else will get better with time and scale.
|
From what I've read so far,what stands out is,that it's most economical not to produce the greenhouse gases in the first place.We need to remove existing GHG,but so far,the operating efficiencies are quite low,costs high.