View Single Post
Old 01-29-2020, 01:44 PM   #51 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,474

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,214
Thanked 4,392 Times in 3,366 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird View Post
There are 2 different potential energies involved. The height is the main but there is energy in the velocity of water as well.
I know what you mean, but height and velocity are the same "energies".

The height difference sets the velocity of water, either by the speed the stream flows (no dam), or by the pressure of the water at the turbine (dam).

All potential energy depends only the volume of water and the height differential.

The reason a dam is more efficient than turbines in a river is that more height differential can be harvested. Flow and power generation can also be modified as needed on a dam, whereas an open river delivers whatever the flow happens to be at the time.

Getting back to the thread title, it seems renewables are inevitable unless nuclear power really catches on.

As an aside, available renewable energy should be going up since the globe is warming. That means more wind, more rain, etc.

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!

Last edited by redpoint5; 01-29-2020 at 01:49 PM..
  Reply With Quote