View Single Post
Old 02-26-2020, 02:16 PM   #433 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,742

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 85.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,469 Times in 3,434 Posts
I'll put on my sendler hat and point out that the higher the battery capacity, the more entrained fossil fuel energy it represents. In other words, it takes a lot of energy to mine, refine, and construct a large battery, and consequently has a longer "break even point" as far as offsetting fossil fuel consumption.

I don't recall the specifics of the study, but a 100 kWh battery might take 150,000 miles to break even on fossil fuel consumption compared with an identical ICE version. The smaller the battery pack, the sooner the EV becomes more environmentally friendly.

The takeaway from the Ted Talk was that plug-in hybrids are an important bridge technology that can end up being more environmentally friendly than an EV equipped with a humongous battery that rarely uses anywhere near the full capacity.

I'll reiterate my point that manufacturers should have been building their vehicles around a 16 kWh battery that would give them 40-50 (30 in a truck or van) miles of EV range. Undersize the ICE and supplement with EV power.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (02-26-2020)