View Single Post
Old 05-11-2020, 06:48 PM   #48 (permalink)
Daschicken
EcoModding flying lizard
 
Daschicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 743

Cibbie - '88 Honda CBR 250R
Motorcycle
90 day: 48.49 mpg (US)

Rarity - '06 Honda Accord EX V6
Team Honda
90 day: 29.88 mpg (US)

Baby viff - '86 Honda VFR 400R
Motorcycle
90 day: 42.15 mpg (US)

Latios - '08 Suzuki SV650SF
Motorcycle
90 day: 64.56 mpg (US)

Mazda 3 - '14 Mazda 3 i Sport
90 day: 43.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 618
Thanked 263 Times in 175 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by EcoCivic View Post
You are probably right. I wonder if certification tests include any full throttle operation? I wouldn't think they would since no one floors it because they want good mileage, but we're talking about the government here so we can't expect their "logic" to make any sense.
Not necessarily full throttle, but a certain amount of acceleration rate. Click on the test details tab and it shows a max acceleration rate of 8.46 mph per second. If the car can’t do that, they just go full throttle.
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/fe_test_schedules.shtml

As far as CVTs and acceleration are concerned, I got a Nissan Sentra rental last year, and it was dreadfully slow off the line. Theory and practice don’t always agree with each other. When it was going faster it was much more eager to rev up, but it didn’t do that off the line. It also didn’t get the kind of mileage I was expecting out of it. A new car with a 1.8 liter engine and fairly tall gearing pretty much matched my 13 year old car with a 3.0 V6 and less tall gearing. Stock vs modded of course, but it didn’t meet expectations.
__________________
-Kaze o tatakaimasen-

Best trip in V6: 52.0
Best tank in V6: 46.0
Best tank in Mazda: 49.9
Best tank in CBR: 61.3
Best tank in SV: 83.9

Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
You can lead a fashion-conscious horse to unusual-looking water...


Last edited by Daschicken; 05-11-2020 at 07:12 PM.. Reason: Sentra, not versa
  Reply With Quote