View Single Post
Old 07-23-2020, 11:20 AM   #616 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,479

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,218
Thanked 4,393 Times in 3,366 Posts
I keep saying over and over, the way you reduce the consumption of something is to tax it, not micromanage design.

Consumers and industry would come up with an optimal solution if petroleum were taxed higher, just as European consumers have chosen more fuel efficient options. It's not that Europeans are genetically superior or something, it's simply that they respond to incentives and disincentives just like anyone else.

If we were serious about reducing fossil fuel consumption, we'd simply progressively raise taxes on it. Then instead of a whole bureaucracy required to police the industry to see which companies need to buy carbon credits, you could replace it all with a single job that evaluates if we're on track to meet consumption goals and adjust as necessary.

As an aside, vehicles have become more fuel efficient over time despite their size and weight increases.

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!

Last edited by redpoint5; 07-23-2020 at 11:26 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
Fat Charlie (07-23-2020)