View Single Post
Old 08-29-2020, 12:47 AM   #81 (permalink)
California98Civic
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vman455 View Post
... Is that what you're asking?
Yes, in part. And thanks, Vman455. That helps. Why do you think pressure readings are higher on this fastback’s roof than on the notchback roof? Why is the pressure higher or about the same on the rear of the fastback body?

Figure 4 in this same article shows the fastback with slightly higher Cd than the notchback, too. But if fastbacks are inferior for drag too, then why are so many low drag vehicles kinda in the fastback shape? The Tesla Model S, the Prius, and the Gen 1 Insight are the most obvious examples. Why aren't those cars notchbacks? One can optimize a fastback to bring down lift (e.g. a well-tuned undertray & diffuser), but why start with a higher lift and higher drag shape in the first place if ALL of them are supposedly so inferior? What's the advantage of a fastback? Cargo area?!

__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.




Last edited by California98Civic; 08-30-2020 at 11:00 AM.. Reason: corrected Vman455
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
aerohead (09-02-2020)