View Single Post
Old 09-29-2020, 10:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Xist
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 29.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,225
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko View Post
I had the Bridgestone ones for a while and was unimpressed.
One vote against Bridgestone and for... stickiness...

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpg_numbers_guy View Post
Michelin Energy Savers were probably one of the best for both fuel economy and longevity. Bridgestone probably wins in terms of LRR and fuel economy but sacrifices a little bit in terms of road noise and lifespan.
Energy Savers it is!

Quote:
Originally Posted by 19bonestock88 View Post
I’m on my third set of Hankook Kinergy ST on my Saturn and I’m still happy with their performance. Likely not as good as the Michelins or the Ecopias but good enough for me and not anywhere near Bridgestone or Michelin price
Here friends we have the Hufflepuff Solution!

Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
As far as I can tell it's the Mich energy saver all season.
Two votes for Energy Savers!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie View Post
I've been a huge fan of Yokohama Avid Ascends for a long time.
I would say "Forget Energy Savers! I am buying Yokohama Avid Ascends!" but it is still two votes for Energy Savers (although they disagree on the flavor) and one for Avids...

Okay, how do you decide when to replace your tires? I am poor, so as long as I am not doing canyon driving I replace my tires when one fails.
__________________
"Oh if you use math, reason, and logic you will be hated."--OilPan4
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Xist For This Useful Post:
Galvatron1 (03-22-2021)