View Single Post
Old 10-18-2020, 01:57 AM   #92 (permalink)
freebeard
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,568
Thanks: 8,094
Thanked 8,886 Times in 7,332 Posts
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by myself
Not speaking for oilpan4, but I go with, in corporate-speak, "Past performance does not guarantee future results"
How is that relevant?
One could apply it to the situation?

Quote:
Freebeard tried floating opportunity costs. In context, what does that really mean?
Same as any other context. Do you find it hard to empathize with other people?

Quote:
If nuclear power (electricity generation) had its major cons eliminated, that'd be great. Radioactive waste, finite fuel source, ... safety, and ... safety are the big ones that come to mind.
I could research this and document it, but it's late. Just research and you will find that newer (4th and 5th gen) reactors can eat high-level waste, operate more efficiently at higher temps, and Thorium is abundant. IIRC the thorium in coal could produce more power than burning it.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote