The Microsoft antitrust lawsuit doesn't make any sense.
1. They lost their claim that including IE in their OS was fundamental to their architecture and thus lost the lawsuit
2. Their OS continued to contain IE as the default browser to this day
3. Despite these practices, they only hold 13% of the browser market share
4. Netscape didn't die, it reincarnated as Firefox
What was the point of the lawsuit again considering these outcomes? I'd feel like a dolt in hindsight if I had been the one to bring charges against MS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
Interesting. I thought DDG doesn't filter bubble it's users. It was at least three layers deep. Duck Duck Go instead of Google
DOJ vs Google
Brave browser |
I understood the irony, but that's also because I Googled the latest Google news.
Perhaps DDG algorithm simply changed the results 10min later when I clicked your link again, rather than adjust the results by profiling me.