View Single Post
Old 11-12-2020, 01:30 AM   #261 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,745

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 85.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
No income, no problem.



I understand the logic, but that looks regressive.
Yes and no. Older vehicles are generally less fuel efficient and are the ones owned by less wealthy people, and newer cars tend to be more fuel efficient and owned by more wealthy. But, the wealthy tend to purchase larger vehicles, which are less fuel efficient. Some less wealthy people purchase inexpensive and highly fuel efficient vehicles...

Roads should be funded from the general fund as needed. Fuel taxes should only be levied to target consumption goals and contribute to the general fund. Registration expenses should cover only the cost of recording ownership.

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote