Quote:
|
I can only assume that it is bad faith when you doggedly continue to spread misinformation, despite being corrected numerous times and given the references that would enable you to correct your misunderstandings.
|
No. You can't. You can't assume that as fact no matter how right you think you are or how wrong you think others are. Not the least reason being that language and communication are not perfect. Sharing knowledge will always be fraught with errors in transcription and comprehension. We can assume there will be errors, we can't assume those will be in bad faith without hard proof of bad faith. You do not have that.
Quote:
|
Today's complete error in your description of how rear diffusers work (other thread) is a perfect example. We can all be certain that (1) you won't acknowledge your error, and (2) you won't consult the reference to correct your misunderstanding, and (3) you'll happily continue to spread that particular piece of misinformation. I'd call doing that: bad faith.
|
I have pointed out several errors in your posts.
We can all be certain that (1) you won't acknowledge your error, and (2) you won't consult the TOS to correct your misunderstanding, and (3) you'll happily continue to spread that particular piece of misinformation.
I'd still
not call doing that: bad faith because that would be an assumption which is literally a conclusion drawn without proof. Do you even science?
__________________
Vortex generators are old tech. My new and improved vortex alternators are unstoppable.
"It’s easy to explain how rockets work but explaining the aerodynamics of a wing takes a rocket scientist.
