Your constant return to the accusation that I’m against debate or of fighting misinformation after explaining to you on so many occasions my complete approval of fighting misinformation is truly amazing. It’s like you can’t hear it.
Quote:
|
And, from what you've already said, clearly you don't know enough about the subject to challenge the misinformation being spread on that topic.
|
You just can’t stop with the put downs can you? You have a clear understanding of my knowledge of aerodynamics from one comment I made about the holy template of glory do you? Well done, sir. But if your command of aerodynamics is so comprehensive one wonders why you feel the need to put people down so much. Shouldn’t your deep knowledge and flawless argumentation be enough to convince people of the inferiority of your opponents without constantly having to point it out?
Quote:
|
and you seemed to have drifted away from the topic... which is car aerodynamics
|
It was you who drifted into personal attacks. I stupidly intervened hoping to try to get you to return to aerodynamics and away from unfounded accusations and wild assumptions. One thing I learned from all this is that you can’t seem to understand the difference between a personal attack and legitimate debate. I have made no claims here of expert knowledge of aerodynamics but I sure know an ad hominem when I see one.
__________________
Vortex generators are old tech. My new and improved vortex alternators are unstoppable.
"It’s easy to explain how rockets work but explaining the aerodynamics of a wing takes a rocket scientist.
