View Single Post
Old 04-23-2021, 11:34 PM   #15 (permalink)
M_a_t_t
マット
 
M_a_t_t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Indiana
Posts: 718

The Van - '95 Chevy Astro Cl V8 Swapped
Team Chevy
90 day: 7.84 mpg (US)

The new bike - '17 Kawasaki Versys X 300 abs
Motorcycle
90 day: 71.94 mpg (US)

The Mercury - '95 Mercury Tracer Trio
Team Ford
90 day: 34.35 mpg (US)

Toyota - '22 Toyota Corolla Hatchback
90 day: 40.11 mpg (US)
Thanks: 131
Thanked 258 Times in 188 Posts
I'm not worried about losing drag as much as the tucking of the radiator. At this point the car has become a balance of what I want to experiment with and best fuel economy. The fuel economy is just the practical benefit/side effect.

Cooling System Basics - Keep It Cool - Super Chevy Magazine

I read this article and it seems the basic factors are thickness (thickness or the core and number of cores) and the area. The material is of course important, but it also says all modern radiators typically use the same design so I shouldn't have to worry about the material. So it seems if I know these numbers from the stock radiator I should be able to come up with a reasonable guess at what would be adequate as a replacement.

Does that logic work out for everyone else?

I also realize it would be a lot of work, but until I take it apart and look at the details it's something I want to consider
__________________
1973 Fiat 124 Special
1975 Honda Civic CVCC 4spd
1981 Kawasaki KZ750E
1981 Kawasaki KZ650 CSR
1983 Kawasaki KZ1100-A3
1986 Nissan 300zx Turbo 5 spd
1995 Chevy Astro RWD (current project)
1995 Mercury Tracer
2017 Kawasaki VersysX 300
2022 Corolla Hatchback 6MT

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6s...LulDUQ8HMj5VKA
  Reply With Quote