Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic
They reviewed or blurbed your book, Julian. They did not confer a degree on you. When someone reviews your manuscript or offers a blurb for your book jacket, they are not signing on to endorse all your subsequent related arguments, especially these personally insulting campaigns against aerohead's qualifications. It seems dubiously ethical that you bring them up so often and clothe yourself in their reputations. Do they know you invoke them so often online to agressively to bolster your credentials?
|
As usual, you are misquoting the context of my reply. Maybe you didn't see it, so I will repeat what I was responding to.
"Julian has been a cancer to the site ever since he came on but he writes just well enough to confuse most people. His technical knowledge is shallow."
If my knowledge was shallow, why would professionals in the subject endorse my books?
It seems to me to be a pretty good question.
Addition: Let me put it another way. I am confident in what I write here - eg in identifying errors that Aerohead spreads - because my understandings and knowledge have been endorsed by real experts. If that hadn't occurred, to be honest I'd probably believe some of the BS that Aerohead spreads - but then again, if you've read any aero textbooks or done any aero testing, it's pretty easy to see issues in much of what he writes.