View Single Post
Old 10-13-2021, 06:13 PM   #236 (permalink)
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,882
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
Direct injection is required for emissions, performance and fuel economy.
Yet sometimes an "outdated" port-injection engine, even though not likely to outperform a counterpart fitted with direct injection, may actually result in a higher fuel economy and lower NOx emissions. Performance-wise, McLaren and Koenigsegg have been doing a great job with port-injection while most of the competition switched to direct injection.


Quote:
You get much better control injecting directly into the cylinder then the intake manifold.
Direct injection has its advantages, yet port-injection remains cost-effective for some applications.


Quote:
If direct injection wasn't a benefit OEMs wouldn't spend the extra money to fit it.
Had either that Freevalve system or something analogue been widespread, it would be the end of direct injection on gassers. And even for flexfuels, there are easily-implemented cold starting aids.
  Reply With Quote