View Single Post
Old 11-06-2021, 09:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
jeff88
Lots of Questions
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose
Posts: 665

Motor-Rolla - '01 Toyota Corolla LE
Team Toyota
90 day: 28.3 mpg (US)

Gaia - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 19.78 mpg (US)

Gaia - Round 2 - '99 Toyota 4runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 17.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 343
Thanked 101 Times in 79 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksa8907 View Post
The larger diameter would slow down the air flow and could cause a loss in power.
Going the other direction... would decreasing the diameter speed up the air flow increasing power? (within reason of course, not downsizing to 1/2" or something)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67-ls1 View Post
I agree. The MAF sensor is calibrated for a certain size intake diameter. If you change the diameter (to much) you will change the velocity of the air. The O2 sensors should keep the A/F ratio correct but it would do it by pulling fuel back because there’s more air than the MAF told the ECM.

I buddy just experienced this is an engine swap in a Jeep where he upsized from 3” to 4” with the stock MAF sensor.
What is too much? Is 1/4" within limits? Say 2-3/4" to 3" diameter pipe?

How does the Jeep run with the 1" larger pipe? Does it have more power, more "zip", better throttle response? Or just the opposite?
__________________
Don't forget to like our Facebook page!




Best EM Quotes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
It has been said, that if you peel the duct tape back on Earth's equator, you'll find that the two hemispheres are held together with J B Weld.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan9 View Post
subscribed with a soda.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
If you're burning,and someone throws gasoline on you,there will be a localized cooling effect, but you're still on fire.
  Reply With Quote