View Single Post
Old 10-08-2008, 09:46 AM   #8 (permalink)
MechEngVT
Mechanical Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 190

The Truck - '02 Dodge Ram 1500 SLT Sport
90 day: 13.32 mpg (US)

The Van 2 - '06 Honda Odyssey EX
90 day: 20.56 mpg (US)

GoKart - '14 Hyundai Elantra GT base 6MT
90 day: 30.24 mpg (US)

Godzilla - '21 Ford F350 XL
90 day: 8.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter7307 View Post
As a rule of thumb, most engines achieve their best fuel economy at an RPM corresponding to a piston speed of 5 to 6 m/s (16.4 to 19.8 ft/s). Piston speed (ft/s)= 2*stroke(inches)*rpm/720.

Piston speed = 2 x Stroke in inches x rpm / 720
Where did you hear this rule of thumb? I had heard 20-25 ft/s but had heard other sources open it a bit more on the lower end.

You should be specific that the formula as entered gives piston speed in ft/s when you noted the rule of thumb values for ft/s as a side note. Nobody would be able to drive if they tried to work this formula to achieve an output of 5-6.

I find it easier to calculate piston speed in terms of feet per minute where the target range corresponding to 20-25 ft/s is 1200-1500 ft/min and the formula is

Piston speed= Stroke in inches x RPM /6

I personally find my best mileage when I center the engine's operating range around about 20 ft/s, shifting at 25 and letting it come down to about 16 in the next gear. Steady-state highway is shifted because my aerodynamics are pisspoor but I still find the best balance of fuel economy and time economy at 20 ft/s (75 mph). I can achieve better fuel economy at slower steady speeds, but I have to drop at least 10 mph to see any significant increases at which point driveability makes it harder to maintain FE due to constant downshifting (5spd trans).
__________________
  Reply With Quote