[aerohead]

1) his sources may be reputable, but the same cannot be said of S-O.
2) his first example is a lie. it is a hypothesis, which the authors freely admitted had never been tested, nor even data gathered, from which to do the test. It was never completed. Never corroborated by other investigators.
3) S-O has no record as a reputable clearing house for scientific data. Just cherry-picked, obscure, hypotheses, never backed up by others.
4) it's not science.
5) get a copy of B.D.'s tax return and you're likely to see who's pulling the levers behind the curtain.