Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
I see a technical problem. A tunnel 3960 feet underground is qualitatively different to a canal running through the lawyers' back yard.
|
The canal the associated rights and precedent is already there. While theoretically property rights create a fustrum in the earths core and a parcel with a rather large base 100 miles up, that has been held to be impracticable and only useful for mineral extraction of ownership, sometimes. Therefore the tunnel difficulty is technological more than legal unless that's what you just implied. Obviously I didn't get it.