View Single Post
Old 12-27-2021, 03:33 PM   #4 (permalink)
freebeard
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 29,002
Thanks: 8,231
Thanked 9,003 Times in 7,437 Posts
Quote:
Quote:
Which would you pick?
I pick all of it, and all not mentioned.
So.... You can't defend any one point (like 'grabens') but find the lot taken as a whole is persuasive?

Quote:
If Scott Adams were acquainted with the scientific method, he'd just accept the information as information.
If you listened, you'd find that his chosen turf is 'persuasion', he goes right past the facts to the intent. OTOH He is kind of a jerk about some things. People suggested he listen to Dr. John Campbell, but he promotes someone else. [ Micheal Schellenberger ]
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

________________
.
.
Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
  Reply With Quote