View Single Post
Old 02-05-2022, 12:10 PM   #5 (permalink)
Ecky
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,018

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,870
Thanked 2,515 Times in 1,555 Posts
Yes. The smaller the volume behind the throttle plate, the smaller the pumping losses (as I understand it). ITBs are an improvement, but you still want some kind of plenum with a single opening, and you'll want to use mass airflow to meter air, because a MAP-based system typically doesn't work well with ITBs.

Even better than ITBs is moving the "throttle" right to the valves. Honda's R series engines (2006+ Civic) vary the intake cam to control valve opening and therefore throttling, under some conditions. It still has a throttle plate, but that gets held wide open when it changes to variable valve timing throttling. Honda claimed a 16% reduction in pumping losses over their standard VTEC system.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
aerohead (02-07-2022), freebeard (02-05-2022)