View Single Post
Old 03-20-2022, 03:17 PM   #7 (permalink)
Autobahnschleicher
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 386

Aerospyder - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Team Toyota
90 day: 41.98 mpg (US)

Simme - '83 IFA Simson Suhl S51
Motorcycle
90 day: 76.59 mpg (US)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 183 Times in 140 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The [original]
Agreed about vehicle dynamics. The candidate I proposed have a low CG, low unsprung weight, an electric rack for low-speed control, and has added torque vectoring since I've driven one.
For a fun oriented EV, I'd go with a transverse mid/rear engined roadster, a ~30 kWh battery pack, multilink rear suspension, MacPherson strut or dual whishbone front suspension and 60% of the weight on the rear axle.
This would allow a weight of about 1000 kg if done right. (done the math for converting my MR2)
For a fun oriented vehicle, I'd not use torque vectoring, but go for a torsen differential and skip electric power steering in favor of a manual steering rack.
A manual rack here would not require much strength as the car would only have about 400 kg on the front axle, but it would provide great feedback.
As for the battery, I would go with a T-shaped pack, fitting partialy in the (rear) engine bay as well as into the "gearbox tunnel".

But that's just how I'd do it
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Autobahnschleicher For This Useful Post:
Isaac Zachary (03-21-2022)