Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
Wrong.
It's not a matter of "if". Only when.
|
1) If that's true, then NASA's improved it's models.
2) If that's true, B.D. will be getting his data from NASA.
3) If that's true, then, as always, I've no need of B.D., I'll just get the straight scoop directly from NASA.
4) And NASA isn't telling me that I have a problem like that.
5) Which makes your conclusion that I'm 'wrong' quite dubious.
6) And take your argument to about the consequences of 'if' and 'when' to National Geographic. They did the research.
7) If there's a 'Carrington Event', and we have a problem, it will be a 'capitalism' problem, not a Carrington Event problem.
8) I won't attribute your comment to malice, just ignorance.